What is the difference between rama and krishna

Refuge of Hanuman, Vibhishana. It did not matter Him who won the Mahabharata War , He was not going to get an inch of land,. He was quite fond of Abhimanyu , His nephew and son of Arjuna ,. The Rishis cursed his son Sambhava to bear a baby , his progeny will be a Thistle and his Faily line would end with him,. Retired Senior Management Professional. Researching Philosophy, Religion. Free lance Writer. Blogger,Tedex Speaker. You are commenting using your WordPress.

He has been lately adjudged as one of the top 24 policy makers of India by leading daily Indian Express. He advises the Government of India on policy issues and innovations in education, startups and youth affairs.

Lord Rama is a superhuman figure with all the virtues that are in the right place — an ideal son, a loving husband, a righteous king and a respectful human being. The image of Lord Rama is that of an aspiration, where every mother or father would aspire to have such a son. On the other hand, Lord Krishna is naughty, full of mirth, a romantic at heart, a friend of friends and a fantastic strategist. His out of the box thinking helps the Pandavas come out with solutions that would otherwise not have been possible.

Moreover, the happy go lucky attitude of Krishna is more identifiable with the current youth. In Ramayana, the storyline is too serious and straight line that the intrigue is missing right from childhood whereas the story of Krishna right from childhood is fun and interesting. Krishna is also known for his ability to keep cool always and never lose his thinking to normal human failings. He is always composed. He then quickly slays Shishupala with utmost composure.

Similarly, his encounters with Jarasandha, Duryodhana, and others are perfectly balanced from his side. His actions are clean executions of his purposeful decisions. Krishna also, at times, gets angry in face of adharma. He is not always the cool and fun-loving person. In the Kurukshetra war, when he sees Arjuna not fighting to his best against a belligerent Bhishma, Krishna gets angry and almost takes up his weapon, against his earlier vow not to bear weapons in the war. Humility, as per the ancient Indian ethical structure, is an important characteristic of a great leader.

We shall now see how Rama and Krishna fare in this attribute. Rama never shows arrogance in spite of his immense strength. His meeting with Shabari and his unhesitating acceptance of her offering of fruits is an excellent example of this. He is humble, yet firm, never weak. In many instances, such as upon slaying of Vali and installing Sugriva and Angada as the king and prince of Kishkinda, any mortal would have shown arrogance, but not Rama. His humility shines through as a sterling quality, specially in one so great in strength, valor, and power.

Krishna too is always grounded in reality. Both Rama and Krishna are strong yet humble. As regards this attribute, both Rama and Krishna are on par. An important aspect of a leader is the way he relates to other people that he comes in contact with. Rama exemplifies the perfection of managing relationships, as we understand them today. In his role as a son, he is willing to go to any length to save the honor of his father. As a brother, he is the guiding force for his younger brothers, earning their respect and respecting them.

As a husband he is loving, caring and loyal. As a friend, he is an embodiment of friendship as seen in his friendship with Hanuman, Sugriva, Vibhishana and so on. Even as an enemy, he is perfect — he gives Ravana several chances to correct the mistakes.

Most importantly, as a king, he treats his subjects as his children and has their welfare as a foremost concern. Each one of his relationships is memorable, even the shorter relationships — such as with a dying Jatayu or the old Shabari. Hence, we see that from the perspectives of all those who related with Rama, he must have seemed perfect. The unfortunate event of renunciation of his wife Sita was a compulsion.

Even then, though he physically separated from her, he was always one with her memory as seen in episodes such as when he uses her image made in gold as a dharma-patni while performing religious rites. Krishna, as in everything else, is a master in human relationships. His relationships with Radha and the gopi s is a matter of everlasting enjoyment for his devotees.

It is said that thousands of gopi s all felt that Krishna was fully and completely with them at the same time. Such was his effect. Krishna, as an enemy, is perfect too. He uses force only as a last resort and there are always options open for his enemies to correct their mistakes. Krishna, unlike Rama, has to deal with many people who have their own vagaries and idiosyncrasies.

By his perfect understanding of their characteristics, he manages them and at times manipulates them. Examples of such are Satyabhama his wife who is perennially jealous and possessive of him ; Balarama his brother who is foolish and stubborn ; Bhishma an honorable man who is fighting on the side of adharma ; Duryodhana who is arrogant ; etc. On the other hand, the people that Rama has to deal with are more in terms of black and white. Also, the events of Ramayana are not as complex in terms of human interplay as the Mahabharata.

His dealings are always straightforward and so are the characters he has to deal with. Krishna understands and utilizes to the full, the strengths and weaknesses of people he has to deal with. The events and characters that Krishna has to deal with cover a much wider spectrum between white and black and thus provide a wider canvas for showcasing his remarkable relationship skills.

The emotional quotient, love and attachment to near and dear reflect a persons approach to life. As such this is an important human attribute and hence may be used as a measure of comparison. Rama stays attached to his family and their memories when they are no longer with him. Can we talk about Krishna without mentioning Radha? Alas, there is just a fleeting mention of her name. The filmi description of the chapters irritates you.

The only character which comes alive is of Satyabhama. She appears to be real, always questioning Krishna and providing some life to an otherwise bland book.

The same goes for the first book. She is so occupied churning out books on mythology that some of the chapters are of one page only, less than words. You start reading a story and lo and behold, it ends within a nimish a second. Ravana is given a good coverage from page 47 to I think her next book will be on Ravana. Mutation linked to remdesivir resistance found in Covid patient.

Alia Bhatt's ad sparks debate. Tiff Diary Do you hear voices inside your head? Search Horoscope.